The Cycle Of Choice
Inner navigation is achieved by learning the course of the Cycle of Choice.
Your PHILOSOPHY (what you believe to be true, what you value) determines how you will think about what happens to you in life, your experience, and how you feel about your life experience...
What you think, the pattern of your thinking, generates your ATTITUDE, your pervasive state of mind from day to day...
Your attitude creates your EMOTIONS, the way you feel about your life experiences...
Your emotions generate BEHAVIOR, how you act out your thoughts and feelings...
Your behavior creates CONSEQUENCES, the results of the choices that you make...
The consequences of your behavior generates the QUALITY OF YOUR LIFE.
If you are dissatisfied with the quality of your life, in part, or in its entirity, go back to square one and have a hard look at your philosophy. Are the beliefs that you subscribe to your own, original, authentic version? Or were they indoctrinated into you by others? If they were learned, do you still believe in them? Do you believe that you can alter your personal philosophy in an authentic manner, rather than out of convenience? Do you think that changes in your belief system could make life more meaningful, more satisfying for you?
From: Positive Atheism <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Monica Harris
Subject: Re: The Cycle of Choice
Date: Sunday, July 11, 1999 8:44 AM
My big problem with changing the belief system is that we tend to be reluctant to "believe" something we don't think to be true. If I try to choose to believe something other than what I think is true, am I not aware that I have made this change in my belief system? How, then, can I leap from a state of being aware that I am trying to believe something I do not now believe to a state of actually believing it? It seems that I must somehow become convinced that it is true before I will actually believe it.
The best and most lasting way to come to a belief is to discover that it is true.
True, one can brainwash oneself over time, from repeated exposure to a certain dogma, but I don't think this tends to build a lasting foundation for belief. To keep it up, one needs repeated and lasting exposure to the dogma or to affiliate with others who say they believe that way. Classic examples of this are regular church or meeting attendance, or cloistering oneself in a cultic living situation. Beliefs developed this way, believe it or not, are the easiest to unlearn.
Many people say they believe something, but when those beliefs are examined, it is found that the statements of belief are meaningless. An example would be: "A god exists outside of space and time." What!? What does this mean? Theodore M. Drange, in his new book, "Nonbelief and Evil: Two Arguments for the Nonexistence of God" describes this phenomenon as "The Mumbo-Jumbo Theory of Some Religious Belief." He says that some people, usually at a very early age, learn to repeat a nonsensical statement and then to tell others that they believe the statement to be true. They cannot really "believe" the statement, though, because it is not a statement at all, but is nonsense -- not unlike saying, "I just drew a triangular parallelogram." I reviewed the Mumbo Jumbo Theory in the June issue.
"Positive Atheism" Magazine
Material by Cliff Walker (including unsigned editorial commentary) is copyright ©1995-2006 by Cliff Walker. Each submission is copyrighted by its writer, who retains control of the work except that by submitting it to Positive Atheism, permission has been granted to use the material or an edited version: (1) on the Positive Atheism web site; (2) in Positive Atheism Magazine; (3) in subsequent works controlled by Cliff Walker or Positive Atheism Magazine (including published or posted compilations). Excerpts not exceeding 500 words are allowed provided the proper copyright notice is affixed. Other use requires permission; Positive Atheism will work to protect the rights of all who submit their writings to us.