Treating Billy Graham
With Kid Gloves?
I was wondering what you can tell me about Billy Graham, I have noticed that commentators in all segments of the media tend to treat him with kid gloves, even the religious satire magazine lists him as the only televangilist they have not done an exposé on. I have not even found much said about him on atheist web-sites (such as psycho Dave's) who do not hesitate to go after religious figures. To me, Billy Graham seems much the same as any other evangelist, so why the special treatment? What is your opinion of Billy Graham? And why do you think people are reluctant to take him on?
From: "Positive Atheism" <email@example.com>
To: "tom jones"
Subject: Re: Billy Graham
Date: Sunday, July 02, 2000 9:20 PM
Is Graham still alive?
Graham, unlike many televangelists, has kept his house in order, violating neither legal statute nor moral precept. He may be a preacher, but he is, in all other respects, a good man.
The big criticism of him lies in the fact that he has acted as advisor to so many U.S. Presidents. As apolitical as his public messages have been (he is no Pat Robertson; he is no Jerry Falwell), he is probably the most political of all the influential preachers throughout American history.
Graham, as seen from the public eye (sermons; television; newspaper columns) has stuck to doing his job. We have never seen him (overtly) lobbying to change the laws of this country (though God doesn't even know what went on behind the closed doors of the Oval Office).
I will say that Graham was, at one time, probably the most brilliant salesman that Madison Avenue has ever seen. He took his skills and applied them to the "profession" of selling religion. I cannot tell you which upsets me more, the fact that he surreptitiously influences government at the highest levels or the fact that he has brought Madison Avenue to the business of evangelism. However, his sales skills probably account for a large aspect of his benign image in the eye of the public -- and even those who would otherwise be his critics.
For a better perspective on the political aspect than I can give you, see "The Closest Thing To A White House Chaplain" by Edward B. Fiske.
"Positive Atheism" Magazine
From: "tom jones"
To: "Positive Atheism" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Billy Graham
Date: Monday, July 03, 2000 4:33 PM
Thanks for the swift and informative reply to my question
Material by Cliff Walker (including unsigned editorial commentary) is copyright ©1995-2006 by Cliff Walker. Each submission is copyrighted by its writer, who retains control of the work except that by submitting it to Positive Atheism, permission has been granted to use the material or an edited version: (1) on the Positive Atheism web site; (2) in Positive Atheism Magazine; (3) in subsequent works controlled by Cliff Walker or Positive Atheism Magazine (including published or posted compilations). Excerpts not exceeding 500 words are allowed provided the proper copyright notice is affixed. Other use requires permission; Positive Atheism will work to protect the rights of all who submit their writings to us.