This Love, Like All
The Others, Is Cheap
Could bonehead "Jeff" really be representative of a religion that says that love is its raison de'tre?
I'm afraid that he just might be.
But this love, like all the others offered us, is offered cheap. In fact, the word cheap is doubly justified here; I love my neighbour only for the ulterior motive of my own salvation, and this love is possible without it's conditions being necessary. On the human level every disagreement or inequality reduces love to a stage production. But for religious reasons, I can love beings whom the whole of my own being detests. What nullities such beliefs engender.
Credo quia absurdum -- I believe because it is absurd. But since the number of possible absurdities is infinite, I am careful to choose those that suit me.
Every sect cries out for itself and the coming of its own God. Judaism prays for Jews, Islam pleads for Mohammedans, Christians seek the reign of Christ the king, Buddhist spirituality works only for itself.
Someone once said that religion, and all its content, holds up a mirror to man's own dysfunction. "Jeff" and his ilk are a testimony to the truth of this statement.
Your site is invaluable as a place where, not only can atheists like myself gather inspiration, but religious bigots like "Jeff" can expose their stupidity for all the world to see.
From: "Positive Atheism Magazine" <email@example.com>
To: "Steve Branks"
Subject: Re: Positive_Atheism_Letters_Section
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 5:08 AM
I set aside my other work to format and post that dialogue precisely because it is so important to give bigots all the bandwidth they need: we must hear them and we must watch them in action if we ever hope to reduce its incidence (or at least figure out how to protect ourselves from it). I've heard that bank tellers can detect a phony bill the instant they touch it because they are so used to handling the real thing all day long. I do this with bigots, and can usually detect one before I've finished reading the first few lines of their letter. (I'd have said "before I've finished reading the first sentence," except that many of these people never learned how to subdivide their tirades into sentences and paragraphs.)
In his book The Mind of the Bible Believer, Edmund Cohen shows that to the fundamentalist Christian, "love" -- what he calls love' ("love-prime") and what the fundamentalists call agape -- is not the same emotion that comes naturally to all healthy humans. The Christian love' is, rather, a form of obedience, and is steeped in what I have called tribal totem loyalism. This exclusivistic loyalism is meticulously introduced into the Bible believer and, in some believers, eventually overrides even the innately human emotion of love. Once this is done, says Richard Dawkins,
|"Faith is powerful enough to immunize people against all appeals to pity, to forgiveness, to decent human feelings. It even immunizes them against fear, if they honestly believe that a martyr's death will send them straight to heaven."|
-- Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene
In my response to Jeff, I tried to distinguish between the "true" Jesus (true according to Jeff), who is every bit the exclusivist Jeff is, and the "false" Jesus -- that warm-and-fuzzy God-is-love Jesus of the Jesus Freaks and the Ecumenical movement and much of the "What Would Jesus Do?" crowd. But if I had to choose, I'd take the warm-and-fuzzy Jesus any day, because believers tend to emulate the god in which they believe (or they believe in a god who suffers from the personality quirks they have). And the New Testament describes enough different Jesuses (Jesi?) to please almost anybody.
Unfortunately for us, Jeff has admitted to being dishonest with us, trying to "bait" us; thus, we cannot really know where he is coming from. He could be one of the Christians described in Cohen's book (likely) or he could be a Discordian pretending to be an unreasonable Christian. (Discordians worship Eris, the goddess of chaos and confusion. They like to try to pull fast ones on James Randi and the rest of us skeptical types, and espouse a fundamentalistic brand of "Aggravated Agnosticism" as described by Robert Anton Wilson.)
I learned early in childhood never to trust someone who says something like, "Aha! I got you good, didn't I?" This is exactly what Jeff did, and so I cannot say that I've learned anything -- besides being reminded that people like Jeff (and my cousin Billy) still exist.
I certainly didn't learn anything about Christianity in all this, because most Christians are much more sincere in their faith than Jeff appears to be. At least, most Christians act more sincere than Jeff has acted; all we really have to go on is behavior, don't we? We cannot really know a person's motives, such as sincerity.
"Positive Atheism" Magazine
Five years of service to
people with no reason to believe
Material by Cliff Walker (including unsigned editorial commentary) is copyright ©1995-2006 by Cliff Walker. Each submission is copyrighted by its writer, who retains control of the work except that by submitting it to Positive Atheism, permission has been granted to use the material or an edited version: (1) on the Positive Atheism web site; (2) in Positive Atheism Magazine; (3) in subsequent works controlled by Cliff Walker or Positive Atheism Magazine (including published or posted compilations). Excerpts not exceeding 500 words are allowed provided the proper copyright notice is affixed. Other use requires permission; Positive Atheism will work to protect the rights of all who submit their writings to us.