What Do Atheists
Think Of The
To: Positive Atheism
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:37 PM
Firstly, congratulations on a very informative and above all, truthful site. I feel I have learned a lot from reading many of the articles.
However, one question which has roused my curiosity is what do atheists think of the Buddhist faith? I use the term "faith" very loosely. A Buddhist would not very often call themselves that and would say that Buddhism is not a faith but a set of guidelines to lead a peaceful and fulfilling life.
I very much hope that you can, no pun intended, enlighten me a little on the subject and am very grateful for any reply. Thank you very much for your time,
From: "Positive Atheism" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: PA-via_Positive_Atheism_Index
Date: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:02 PM
As long as we understand that by "faith" you mean religion, and not necessarily what a Christian would mean in describing "the saving faith in Christ," I think the use of the word is legitimate. However, I try to avoid oxymoronic use of terms such as "devout atheist," especially if the oxymoron could be seen as degrading. I don't get a sense of degradation from your use of faith here.
Buddhism is probably my favorite religion, although Buddhism, like all organized ideologies, opens itself to abuse and exploitation. If Pat Robertson gains control and we are all required to join a religion, I'd join the Unitarian Church and quietly practice atheistic Buddhism; If he made us join only Christian religions, there are plenty of Christian sects which are essentially Buddhism with the names changed. Most of the tenets in the New Testament that I consider healthy or good can be traced to the fact that Buddhism was popular in the Palestine regions during the times Christ is alleged to have lived.
I like Buddhism because it tends to have built-in protection against the exclusivism which is so prevalent in the monotheistic religions. Buddhism thus avoids the problem of thinking there is any such thing One True Faith. Because of this, the idea of "us-versus-them" is, for the most part, absent from Buddhism (though you will find vestiges of "us-versus-them" thinking in almost any organized ideology -- including some expressions of atheism; the only organized ideology which actively and openly shuns the "us-versus-them" thinking altogether is liberal scientific method).
While some Buddhists, particularly those in the West, tend to get evangelical about it, the sense of urgency found in many expressions Christianity and Islam is not present in most forms of Buddhism. Again, I think this urgency has more to do with monotheism than anything else: monotheists think there's only one expression of truth, that they have a monopoly this one expression (since they believe in the One True God), and thus think it is their duty to "help" the rest of us see the light (whatever it takes). This "Right Man" syndrome, as Colin Wilson put it, tends to get out of hand.
"Positive Atheism" Magazine
Five years of service to
people with no reason to believe
Material by Cliff Walker (including unsigned editorial commentary) is copyright ©1995-2006 by Cliff Walker. Each submission is copyrighted by its writer, who retains control of the work except that by submitting it to Positive Atheism, permission has been granted to use the material or an edited version: (1) on the Positive Atheism web site; (2) in Positive Atheism Magazine; (3) in subsequent works controlled by Cliff Walker or Positive Atheism Magazine (including published or posted compilations). Excerpts not exceeding 500 words are allowed provided the proper copyright notice is affixed. Other use requires permission; Positive Atheism will work to protect the rights of all who submit their writings to us.