Positive Atheism’s Big List of Quotations
|
Sp-Ste |
No-Frames Quotes Index
Load This File With Frames Index
Home to Positive Atheism
![]()
|
Gerry Spence
|
![]()
![]()
|
Herbert Spencer (1820-1903)
[Agnostics are] people who, like myself, confess themselves to be hopelessly ignorant concerning a variety of matters, about which metaphysicians and theologians, both orthodox and heterodox, dogmatize with the utmost confidence. The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly, is to fill the world with fools. The “Creed of Christendom” is alien to my nature, both emotional and intellectual. There is no origin for the idea of an afterlife, save the conclusion which the savage draws from the notion suggested by dreams. Religion has been compelled by science to give up one after another of its dogmas, of those assumed cognitions which it could not substantiate. The preservation of health is a duty. Few seem conscious that there is such a thing as physical morality. We hear with surprise of the savage who, falling down a precipice, ascribes the failure of his foothold to a malicious demon; and we smile at the kindred notion of the ancient Greek, that his death was prevented by a goddess who unfastened for him the thong of the helmet by which his enemy was dragging him. But daily, without surprise, we hear men who describe themselves as saved from shipwreck by “divine interposition” ... and the Christian priest who says prayers over a sick man in the expectation that the course of the disease will be stayed, differ only in respect of the agent from whom they expect supernatural aid. The idea of disembodied spirits is wholly unsupported by evidence, and I cannot accept it. Divine right of kings means the divine right of anyone who can get uppermost. The cruelty of a Fijian god, who, represented as devouring the souls of the dead, may be supposed to inflict torture during the process, is small compared with the cruelty of a God who condemns men to tortures which are eternal. Hero-worship is strongest where there is least regard for human freedom. Those who cavalierly reject the Theory of Evolution, as not adequately supported by facts, seem quite to forget that their own theory is supported by no facts at all. The more specific idea of Evolution now reached is — a change from an indefinite, incoherent homogeneity to a definite, coherent heterogeneity, accompanying the dissipation of motion and integration of matter. |
![]()
|
Benedict [Baruch] Spinoza (1632-1677)
I believe that a triangle, if it could speak, would say that God is eminently triangular, and a circle that the divine nature is eminently circular; and thus would every one ascribe his own attributes to God. Anyone who seeks for the true causes of miracles, and strives to understand natural phenomena as an intelligent being, and not to gaze at them like a fool, is set down and denounced as an impious heretic. Laws which prescribe what everyone must believe, and forbid men to say or write anything against this or that opinion, are often passed to gratify, or rather to appease the anger of those who cannot abide independent minds. The proper study of a wise man is not how to die but how to live. I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them. |
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902) Check our Big List of Elizabeth Cady Stanton Quotations
The Bible and the Church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of women’s emancipation. The memory of my own suffering has prevented me from ever shadowing one young soul with the superstitions of the Christian religion. The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. Heavenly Father and Mother, make us thankful for all the blessings of this life, and make us ever mindful of the patient hands that oft in weariness spread our tables and prepare our daily food. For humanity’s sake, Amen.
I have endeavoured to dissipate these religious superstitions from the minds of women, and base their faith on science and reason, where I found for myself at last that peace and comfort I could never find in the Bible and the church. The happiest people I have known have been those who gave themselves no concern about their own souls, but did their uttermost to mitigate the miseries of others. |
![]()
![]()
Rodney Stark See: The Scary Side of Rodney Stark
People value religion on the basis of cost, and they don’t value the cheapest ones the most. Religions that ask nothing get nothing. ... I don’t believe establishment is good for churches. It gets them involved in the worldly realm in ways that are unsuitable and corrupting. By the end of Constantine’s reign, we see people competing madly to become bishops because of the money. After that, Christianity was no longer a person-to-person movement. The main thing you’ve got to recognize is that success is really about relationships and not about faith. What happens is that people form relationships and only then come to embrace a religion. It doesn’t happen the other way around. That’s really critical, and it’s something that you can only learn by going out and watching people convert to new movements. We would never, ever, have figured that out in the library. You can never find that sort of thing out after the fact — because after the fact people do think it’s about faith. And they’re not lying, by the way. They’re just projecting backwards. ... All questions concerning the rise of Christianity are one: How was it done? How did a tiny and obscure messianic movement from the edge of the Roman Empire dislodge classical paganism and become the dominant faith of Western civilization? Although this is the only question, it requires many answers — no one thing led to the triumph of Christianity. There’s a consensus among historians that the numbers [of Christian martyrs] weren’t large at all, and that we may know the name of just about every single martyr.... As for miracles: listen, people do get healed — spontaneously and, it would seem, miraculously. There’s not a physician on earth who would deny that. What is the agency? I don’t know. But to deny that people in tabernacles around the United States are getting healed is simply wrong. There’s no reason to deny that these things happen just because we don’t share the definitions put on them by the people of another time or place. That’s true [that I’m “not religious as that term is conventionally understood,”] though I’ve never been an atheist. Atheism is an active faith; it says, “I believe
there is no God.” But I don’t know what I believe. I was brought up a Lutheran in Jamestown, North Dakota. I have trouble with faith. I’m not proud of this. I don’t think it makes me an intellectual. I would believe if I could, and I may be able to
before it’s over. I would welcome that. |
![]()
|
Sir Richard Steele (1672-1729) Check out Scary, Scary Sir Richard Steele
|
![]()
|
Joseph Lincoln Steffens (1866-1936)
Morality is only moral when it is voluntary.
Darrow explains Steffens’ irony “Everything serious that he says is a joke and everything humorous that he says is dead serious.” |
![]()
![]()
|
Gertrude Stein (1874-1946)
|
![]()
|
Gordon Stein (1941-1996)
Because of the confusion surrounding the term “agnosticism,” it would seem better to use the very similar term “rationalism” in its place when referring to the original Huxleyan meaning of the term. The use of “rationalist” for “agnostic” would also seem to be less ambiguous. If theism is the belief in the existence of God, then a-theism ought to mean “not theism” or “without theism.” Actually, there is no notion of “denial” in the origin of the word, and the atheist who denies the existence of God is by far the rarest type of atheist — if he exists at all. Rather, the word atheism means to an atheist “lack of belief in the existence of a God or gods.” An atheist is one who does not have a belief in God, or who is without a belief in God. The importance of these distinctions is that one cannot understand what one cannot define accurately. An atheist cannot deny the existence of that which he finds to be without meaning, namely the term *God. In order to deny the existence of something, one must know what the term one is denying means. We should always keep an open mind about any new phenomenon in nature. To merely say “that’s impossible, therefore it doesn’t exist,” is to commit a serious error. A much better approach
would be to say “That’s quite unlikely, but show me the evidence you have that says that it may be so.” It would be the height of arrogance to think that man knows everything possible about the Universe or the Earth. There are many things yet to be
discovered, and that is why we have scientific research (or any kind of research). That should be the rationalist’s approach to parapsychology and the occult. Many of the innovations in science and philosophy have come from unbelievers, some of whom died for their “unbeliefs.” Without unbelief, we might well be living in the Dark Ages
or at least in the intellectual equivalent of that time. |
![]()
|
Gloria Steinem (b. 1934)
However sugarcoated and ambiguous, every form of authoritarianism must start with a belief in some group’s greater right to power, whether that right is justified by sex, race, class, religion or all four. However far it may expand, the progression inevitably rests on unequal power and airtight roles within the family. |
![]()
|
Charles Proteus Steinmetz (1865-1923)
No evidence or proof of the existence of a God has been found in the phenomena of nature, based on experience.
Marking dynamos for repair $10,000.00 -- 2 hours labor $10.00; knowing where to mark $9,990.00. |
![]()
![]()
|
Victor J Stenger Check our Interview with Particle Physicist Victor J Stenger (November, 1999)
When people start using science to argue for their specific beliefs and delusions, to try to claim that they’re supported by science, then scientists at least have to speak up and say, “You’re welcome to your delusions, but don’t say that they’re supported by science.” Scientific evidence for God’s existence is being claimed today by theists, many of whom carry respectable scientific or philosophical credentials. “He” who is neither a “she” nor an “it” supposedly answers prayers and otherwise dramatically affects the outcome of events. If these consequences are as significant as believers say, then the effects should be detectable in properly controlled experiments. The battle over the validity of evolution has been publicly posed as a scientific one. However, you will find little sign of it in scientific journals, where such quarrels as exist are over details, not the basic concept.... Evolution has proved so useful as a paradigm for the origin and structure of life that it constitutes the foundation of the sciences of biology and medicine. In short, evolution is as close to being a scientific fact as is possible for any theory, given that science is open-ended and no one can predict with certainty what may change in the future. The prospect that evolution by natural selection, at least as a broad mechanism, will be overthrown in the future is about as likely as the prospect of finding out some day that the Earth is really flat. Unfortunately, those who regard these scientific facts as a threat to faith have chosen to distort and misrepresent them to the public. From this experience, I have learned what science asks of us when we claim the existence of an extraordinary new phenomenon. It requires much, including years of hard work, uncompromising honesty, and willingness to accept failure. I can quickly recognize fallacious logic or faulty experimental procedure when I read a paper that purports to observe something that goes beyond existing knowledge. I am dubious and suspicious whenever an important result has been obtained too easily or too quickly, and reported in the media before it has run the gamut of critical review by disinterested, knowledgeable parties. To most theistic believers, human life can have no meaning in a universe without God. Quite sincerely, and with understandable yearning for a meaning to their existence, they reject the possibility of no God. In their minds, only a purposeful universe based on God is possible and science can do nothing else but support this “truth.” The argument from design stands or falls on whether it can be demonstrated that some aspect of the universe such as its origin or biological life could not have come about naturally. The burden of proof is ... on the supernaturalist to demonstrate that something from outside nature must be introduced to explain the data. |
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Sir Leslie Stephen (1832-1904)
|
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| |||||||||||
The Subtle Fulmination of the Encircled Sea Please Feel Free Grab some quotes to embellish your web site, Use them to introduce the chapters of a book or Poster your wall! Graffiti your (own) fence. That's what this list is for! In using this resource, however, keep in mind that If you decide to build your own online
There's something to be said | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||